Modelado de estructuras reentrantes en un perfil aerodinámico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/ingenierias29.101-998Palabras clave:
Aleación Ti-Zr, propiedades superelásticas, geometrías reentrantes, simulación, perfil aerodinámicoResumen
Las propiedades superelásticas de una aleación con memoria de forma Ti-Zr se evaluaron mediante una estructura auxética reentrante integrada en un perfil aerodinámico, usando elementos finitos no lineales. Se desarrolló un modelo constitutivo para describir la respuesta mecánica del material y se implementó un modelo numérico con elementos tipo viga por su eficiencia computacional. Las configuraciones quirales ofrecieron mayor flexibilidad y capacidad de carga, mostrando desplazamientos elevados con tensiones limitadas. Los resultados numéricos mostraron buena concordancia con datos experimentales, demostrando el potencial de estas aleaciones en perfiles aerodinámicos de deformación suave.
Descargas
Citas
1. Shaw, J. A. (1995). Thermomechanical aspects of NiTi. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 43(8), 1243–1281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(95)00024-D
2. Fu, J., Yamamoto, A., Kim, H. Y., Hosoda, H., & Miyazaki, S. (2015). Novel Ti-based superelastic alloys with large recovery strain and excellent biocompatibility. Acta Biomaterialia, 17, 56–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.001
3. Li, S., & Nam, T. (2019). Superelasticity and tensile strength of Ti–Zr–Nb–Sn alloys with high Zr content for biomedical applications. Intermetallics, 112, 106545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2019.106545
4. López, L., Lopez, E., Villalpando, S., Moreno, I., Young, H., & Miyazaki, S. (2018). Effect of heat treatment condition on microstructure and superelastic properties of Ti–24Zr–10Nb–2Sn. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 782, 893–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.266
5. Lopez, L., Young, H., Hosoda, H., & Miyazaki, S. (2015). Effect of Nb content and heat treatment temperature on superelastic properties of Ti–24Zr–(8–12)Nb–2Sn alloys. Materials Science Division, University of Tsukuba.
6. Viet, N. T., Zaki, W., Umer, R., & Xu, Y. (2020). Mathematical model for superelastic shape memory alloy springs with large spring index. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 185–186, 159–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.08.022
7. Esposito, L., Fraldi, M., Ruocco, E., & Sacco, E. (2021). A shape memory alloy helix model accounting for extension and torsion. European Journal of Mechanics - A/Solids, 89, 104281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104281
8. Harkati, E., Daoudi, N., Bezazi, A., Haddad, A., & Scarpa, F. (2017). In-plane elasticity of a multi re-entrant auxetic honeycomb. Composite Structures, 180, 130–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.014
9. Auricchio, F., & Taylor, R. L. (1997). Shape memory alloys: Modeling and numerical simulation of the finite strain superelastic behavior. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 143, 175–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-4
10. Saleeb, A. F., Natsheh, S. H., & Owusu-Danquah, J. S. (2017). Efficiency of finite element analyses of 55NiTi SMA actuators: Solid versus beam and shell modeling. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 136, 58–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2017.07.011
11. Brinson, L. C. (1993). One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: Thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 4, 229–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X9300400213
12. Pelton, A., Schroeder, V., Mitchell, M., Gong, X., Barney, M., & Robertson, S. (2008). Fatigue and durability of nitinol stents. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 1(2), 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.08.001
13. Bianchi, M., Scarpa, F., & Smith, C. W. (2010). Shape memory behavior in auxetic foams: Mechanical properties. Acta Materialia, 58, 858–865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.063
14. Hassan, M. R., Scarpa, F., Ruzzene, M., & Mohammed, N. A. (2008). Smart shape memory alloy chiral honeycomb. Materials Science and Engineering A, 481–482, 654–657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.219
15. Jacobs, S., Coconnier, C., DiMaio, D., Scarpa, F., Toso, M., & Martinez, J. (2012). Deployable auxetic shape memory alloy cellular antenna demonstrator: Design, manufacturing and modal testing. Smart Materials and Structures, 21, 075013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/21/7/075013
16. Rossiter, J., Takashima, K., Scarpa, F., Walters, P., & Mukai, T. (2014). Shape memory polymer hexachiral auxetic structures with tunable stiffness. Smart Materials and Structures, 23, 045007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/4/045007
17. Hassan, M. R., Scarpa, F., & Mohamed, N. A. (2009). In-plane tensile behavior of shape memory alloy honeycombs with positive and negative Poisson’s ratio. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 20, 897–905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X08099605
18. Budarapu, P. R., Y. B., S. S., & Natarajan, R. (2016). Design concepts of an aircraft wing: Composite and morphing airfoil with auxetic structures. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 10(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0352-z
19. Chen, Z., Wu, X., Wang, Z., & Shao, J. (2020). Concepts for morphing airfoil using novel auxetic lattices. En Z. Jing (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerospace System Science and Engineering 2019 (ICASSE 2019) (Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 622). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1773-0_20
20. Huang, J., Zhang, Q., Scarpa, F., Liu, Y., & Leng, J. (2017). In-plane elasticity of a novel auxetic honeycomb design. Composites Part B: Engineering, 110, 72–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.011
21. Yang, L., Harrysson, O., West, H., & Cormier, D. (2015). Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 69–70, 475–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005
22. Maran, S., Masters, I. G., & Gibbons, G. J. (2020). Additive manufacture of 3D auxetic structures by laser powder bed fusion—Design influence on manufacturing accuracy and mechanical properties. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217738
23. Fu, M.-H., Chen, Y., & Hu, L.-L. (2017). A novel auxetic honeycomb with enhanced in-plane stiffness and buckling strength. Composite Structures, 160, 574–585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.090
24. Sun, J., Du, L., Scarpa, F., Liu, Y., & Leng, J. (2021). Morphing wingtip structure based on active inflatable honeycomb and shape memory polymer composite skin: A conceptual work. Aerospace Science and Technology, 111, 106541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106541
25. Xu, L., Baxevanis, T., & Lagoudas, D. C. (2019). A three-dimensional constitutive model for the martensitic transformation in polycrystalline shape memory alloys under large deformation. Smart Materials and Structures, 28, 074004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab1acb
26. Bornengo, D., Scarpa, F., & Remillat, C. (2005). Evaluation of hexagonal chiral structure for morphing airfoil concept. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 219(3), 185–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/095441005X30216
27. Heo, H., Ju, J., & Kim, D.-M. (2013). Compliant cellular structures: Application to a passive morphing airfoil. Composite Structures, 106, 560–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.013
28. Spadoni, A., & Ruzzene, M. (2007). Static aeroelastic response of chiral-core airfoils. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 18(10), 1067–1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X06072361
29. Martin, J., Heyder-Bruckner, J.-J., Remillat, C., Scarpa, F., Potter, K., & Ruzzene, M. (2008). The hexachiral prismatic wingbox concept. Physica Status Solidi (b), 245(3), 570–577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.200777709
30. Shaw, J. A. (2012). Shape memory alloy honeycombs: Experiments and simulation. Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference.
31. Spadoni, A., & Ruzzene, M. (2007). Numerical and experimental analysis of the static compliance of chiral truss-core airfoils. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2(5), 965–981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2007.2.965
32. Qiu, K., Wang, R., Zhu, J., & Zhang, W. (2020). Optimization design of chiral hexagonal honeycombs with prescribed elastic properties under large deformation. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 33(3), 902–909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.025
33. Bettini, P., Airoldi, A., Sala, G., Landro, L. D., Ruzzene, M., & Spadoni, A. (2010). Composite chiral structures for morphing airfoils: Numerical analyses and development of a manufacturing process. Composites Part B: Engineering, 41(2), 133–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.005
34. Zhu, Y., Wang, Z.-P., & Poh, L. H. (2018). Auxetic hexachiral structures with wavy ligaments for large elasto-plastic deformation. Smart Materials and Structures, 27(5), 055001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aab33d
35. Heo, H., Ju, J., Kim, D.-M., & Jeon, C.-S. (2011). Passive morphing airfoil with honeycombs. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition (IMECE2011-64350), 263–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2011-64350
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Dr. Ricardo Parga Montemayor, Dr. Luis Alberto López Pavón, Dr. Luis Arturo Reyes Osorio, M.C. Diego Reducindo Almanza, Dr. Luis Alberto López Pavón
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
